Ibn Udayo hands over the Shabwa areas to the Houthis and threatens his opponents with the fate of "President Saleh"

English - Saturday 25 September 2021 الساعة 09:29 am
Shabwa, NewsYemen, private:

The governor of Shabwa Governorate, the Brotherhood, "Mohammed Saleh bin Udayo" did not justify the fall of three districts in the governorate to the hands of the Houthi group loyal to Tehran, but rather went to shift the blame to those he described as cheerleaders.

Ibn Udayo kept silent for two days after the fall of Bayhan, Usailan, Naqoub and Markha, then went out to talk about the cheerleaders on social media, and mourned the killing of former President Ali Abdullah Saleh, who was killed defending the republic, values and principles.

Ibn Udayu did not blame the fall of these districts without a fight for his forces in the Bayhan axis, which consists of 7 brigades. Rather, he went a long way, trying to distort the truth towards flimsy and ridiculous excuses that explain the amount of failure and fear of facing the truth.

In the video clip broadcast by the "Bilqis" channel, Ibn Udayo attacked the former president, the martyr Ali Abdullah Saleh, explaining the extent of his hatred and his party against all those who fought these militias and fell as a martyr in the face of the Iranian movement.

In response to Ibn Udayi's attack on Saleh, at a time when everyone needs reconciliation and unification of efforts to confront the militias, political activist "Hamza Talian Al-Muradi" said in a tweet to him, "Tell the brotherhood of Ibn Udayo that Afash fought the fight of heroes until he was martyred in front of his house and died an honorable death at the time when Brotherhood leaders fled in women's gowns and left their homes for the Houthis to tamper with.

Al-Muradi continued, in response to Ibn Udayi's abuse of Saleh: Although the Russian plane was waiting for Afash, and Russia was ready to take him to any country he wanted and live in the most luxurious palaces, but he refused to escape and a life of humiliation and chose to die the death of the brave.

In another tweet, Al-Muradi explained to those who defended Ibn Udayy and that he did not attack Saleh, saying, "If Ibn Udayo only wanted to give an example, why did he not have mercy on Afash and say the martyr or the former president or even the head of the Congress Party instead of Afash as if he were his young son?"

He added: If he wanted to give an example, why did he choose Afash specifically, why did he not give an example about his party and its leaders, such as Al-Lidoumi, Qahtan and Al-Ansi, who allied with Al-Houthi in 2011, and then Al-Houthi reneged on the alliance, betrayed the covenant, betrayed them, displaced them, and occupied their homes in 2015?

Observers believe that Ibn Adyo should have presented a conciliatory discourse with the other anti-Houthi forces to unify efforts towards defeating this group, which overnight controlled large areas in Shabwa Governorate, but he did not abandon his party's hatred against the parties that achieved great successes in the war. With the Houthi militias, the militia counts a thousand accounts.

Brotherhood forces in Shabwa did not defend Bayhan, Usailan, Markah, and al-Naqoub. Rather, these areas were handed over in full view and hearing, and it became clear to the citizens in the governorate that there was handover and receipt between the Brotherhood and Houthi groups, especially since they did not fire a single shot during the fall of these districts.

Ibn Udayo continued his war against the active forces against the Houthi militias in the most severe circumstances in which everyone needs rapprochement and forgetting differences, until he reached the point of attacking the Arab coalition, especially the United Arab Emirates, which is the active member of the coalition and who achieved the only victories over the militias in the country, and accused them of Falsely and slanderously earlier, by not supporting the liberation of the governorate during the Houthi occupation.. He denied all Emirati efforts in the governorate, forgetting that he and his party were the first to flee and returned years after its liberation.

On the hadith of Ibn Udayo, the political writer Saeed Bakran said that he expected that Ibn Udayo would come out with a manly speech, and praised him for carrying arms with his knowledge of his lies and the lies of his cheap, treacherous group, but he was quickly disappointed, indicating that he was surprised by Ibn Udayo’s evasion of responsibility.

"Bakran" continued, directing his speech to Ben Udayo , "Three directorates, you deceiver, handed them over to Al-Houthi without a fight, then you pour out your anger on those who say they cheer for Al-Houthi, as if the betrayal occurred on Facebook and not from your forces and from you," adding: "If there was a country and we had a president and law." He and a respectable army will judge your place today in prison in a public court martial."

Bakran continued, "Billions are under your hand, you spent in corruption projects and basement contracting. You did not lack money, capabilities, or forces," wondering: How did three districts fall without a fight? Chased, imprisoned and assassinated by your assassination squads, every setback for you and your group is very natural and very humane, to provoke feelings of healing in you and your group.